Ryan Sweeting vs Jamie Baker Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L L L W L L L W L
Form
W W W L W W W L W LH2H: Sweeting 4 - 0 Baker
They have played 8 sets in total, with Sweeting winning 8 and Baker winning 0. The last match between Sweeting and Baker was at the Sarasota Challenger, 12-05-2010, Second, Clay with Ryan Sweeting getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Ryan Sweeting | 4 |
| Jamie Baker | 0 |
Sarasota Challenger(12-05-2010)
6
2
6
4
| Sweeting | Stats | Baker |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 4 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 64 | Highest Rank | 186 |
| 37 | Age | 38 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 5 | Titles | 12 |
| 57% (249-190) | Career Total W/L | 59% (360-247) |
| $476,645 | Career Prize Money | $92,130 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 2 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Keys VS Kalinskaya PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
26 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Draper VS Griekspoor PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
26 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-4 |
Stats 
Ryan Sweeting
Player
Jamie Baker
87%
(
58 of
67)
1st Serve %
64%
(
34 of
53)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
44%
(
4 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
33%
(
22 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
||||
| 6-2 6-4 | |||||
| 6-4 6-4 | |||||
| 6-3 6-0 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 4 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 8 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 48 | Games Won | 23 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 87% (58/67) | 1st Serve % | 64% (34/53) |
| 71% (41/58) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (23/34) |
| 44% (4/9) | 2nd Serve Win % | 37% (7/19) |
| 60% (3/5) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/3) |
| 43% (23/53) | Return Points Win % | 33% (22/67) |
| 100% (4/4) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/4) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (4/4) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (4/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (4/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Ryan Sweeting Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Ryan Sweeting
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve %
42%
(
16 of
38)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
10
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
54
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ryan Sweeting
Player
Carsten Ball
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve %
81%
(
46 of
57)
5
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
1
92%
(
34 of
37)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
15%
(
8 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
18 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Edward Corrie
Player
Ryan Sweeting
57%
(
36 of
63)
1st Serve %
57%
(
30 of
53)
4
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
5
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
22 of
30)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
19 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
21 of
53)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gregory Ouellette
Player
Ryan Sweeting
51%
(
39 of
76)
1st Serve %
71%
(
76 of
107)
7
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
47 of
76)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
37%
(
28 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
49 of
107)
97
Total Points Won
86
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Hyeon Chung
Player
Ryan Sweeting
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve %
72%
(
34 of
47)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ryan Sweeting
Player
Tennys Sandgren
88%
(
46 of
52)
1st Serve %
52%
(
32 of
61)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
67%
(
4 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Guido Andreozzi
Player
Ryan Sweeting
53%
(
26 of
49)
1st Serve %
41%
(
17 of
41)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
9
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
39%
(
19 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
57
Total Points Won
33
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicolas Meister
Player
Ryan Sweeting
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
63%
(
35 of
56)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
66
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Jamie Baker Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 | 6-7(5) 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Benoit Paire
Player
Jamie Baker
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
9
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
49
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jamie Baker
Player
Marcelo Melo
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve %
67%
(
35 of
52)
1
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Jamie Baker
Player
James Duckworth
60%
(
52 of
86)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
85)
1
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
7
79%
(
41 of
52)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
39 of
53)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
9%
(
1 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
31%
(
27 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
29 of
85)
88
Total Points Won
83
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jamie Baker
Player
Prakash Amritraj
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
59%
(
43 of
73)
4
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
0
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
15 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
73)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adrian Mannarino
Player
Jamie Baker
59%
(
44 of
74)
1st Serve %
60%
(
45 of
75)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
84%
(
37 of
44)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
34 of
45)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
21 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
26 of
75)
79
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jamie Baker
Player
Ilija Bozoljac
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve %
64%
(
32 of
50)
0
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
3
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
21 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jamie Baker
Player
Miles Bugby
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
45%
(
25 of
55)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
65
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Jamie Baker
Player
John-Patrick Smith
61%
(
42 of
69)
1st Serve %
67%
(
39 of
58)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
0
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
67%
(
18 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
13 of
19)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
21 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
22 of
58)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57% (249/190) | Win/Loss | 59% (360/247) |
| 55% (567/461) | Sets Win/Loss | 57% (810/601) |
| 52% (5033/4658) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (7106/6351) |
| 55% (142/115) | Hard Win/Loss | 63% (217/126) |
| 66% (51/26) | Clay Win/Loss | 39% (9/14) |
| 58% (44/32) | Indoor Hard W/L | 58% (109/79) |
| 41% (12/17) | Grass Win/Loss | 47% (25/28) |
| 0.19 | Aces Per Game | 0.05 |
| 908 | Aces Total | 339 |
| 0.2 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.03 |
| 937 | Total Double Faults | 185 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 631.33 | Average Opponent Rank | 47.4 |
| 64% (10470/16355) | 1st Serve % | 64% (5233/8167) |
| 68% (7144/10470) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (3526/5233) |
| 49% (2866/5895) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (1513/2934) |
| 42% (675/1606) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 38% (264/700) |
| 39% (6466/16485) | Return Points Win % | 37% (3043/8193) |
| 53% (25/22) | Slam W/L | 48% (12/13) |
| 48% (15/16) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | Cups W/L | 50% (4/4) |
| 56% (72/56) | Main Tour W/L | 45% (20/24) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 58% (121/86) | Challenger W/L | 49% (108/113) |
| 64% (16/9) | Futures W/L | 70% (216/92) |
| 58% (241/413) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (354/591) |
| 23% (5/22) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 9% (1/11) |
| 56% (76/135) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (112/204) |
| 54% (65/121) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (98/188) |
| 85% (254/217) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (353/302) |
| 14% (254/36) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (353/51) |
| 17% (185/31) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (254/58) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
